Comments:
<pre>Our Political Tasks is TrotskyΓÇÖs response to the 1903 split in Russian Social Democracy and a spirited reply to LeninΓÇÖs What Is To Be Done? and One Step Forwards, Two Steps Back. A passionate, insightful attack on LeninΓÇÖs theory of party organisation and an outline of TrotskyΓÇÖs own views on party structure, this controversial work was later disowned by Trotsky after he joined the Bolsheviks. Though it is far from TrotskyΓÇÖs best work on a literary level (the young Trotsky tends to be repetitive, excessively sarcastic, overly verbose and generally in need of a good editor), the work is, nevertheless, a remarkable insight into the young TrotskyΓÇÖs thinking and a vibrant expression of his commitment to revolution. It is, at times, hauntingly prophetic in its predictions of where the Leninist conception of democratic centralism may lead. For example, in the chapter Down With Substitutionism in Part II of the book, Trotsky writes in what could be a description of Stalinism:
In the internal politics of the Party these methods lead, as we shall see below, to the Party organisation ΓÇ£substitutingΓÇ¥ itself for the Party, the Central Committee substituting itself for the Party organisation, and finally the dictator substituting himself for the Central Committee
It is very difficult to find an edition of this work in any language, as the bookΓÇÖs line on the party is not consistent with that of most Trotskyist organisations. Our Political Tasks fell into obscurity after the 1917 Revolution only to be used and misrepresented by TrotskyΓÇÖs enemies during the leadership struggle, which followed LeninΓÇÖs death. The book (and, implicitly, the Marxist tradition of spirited debate and critical thought) was used to attack Trotsky for being insufficiently Leninist and to smear him with the accusation of Menshivism (for an especially vicious example see StalinΓÇÖs 1927 speech The Trotskyist Opposition Then and Now). In fact, Our Political Tasks outlines a political position which, while critical of LeninΓÇÖs, is also clearly revolutionary and distinct from what would become Menshevism.
This version is based on the English language translation published by New Park Publications in the early 1970s. Spelling and typographical errors have been corrected (and hopefully not replaced with new spelling and typographical errors) and several of the translationΓÇÖs more egregious grammatical errors have also been corrected.
For another criticism of LeninΓÇÖs position on party organisation from a left wing perspective, see Rosa LuxemburgΓÇÖs Organisational Questions of the Russian Social Democracy later republished as Leninism or Marxism? For LeninΓÇÖs views, see What Is To Be Done? and One Step Forward, Two Steps Back. For TrotskyΓÇÖs later views on the 1903 split see chapter 12, The Party Congress and the Split in My Life.
</pre>
External comments