Professor Robert Schoch of Boston University-Geology states the Sphinx is of Atlantean origins True?

Download Torrent Secure download Usenet 5x faster downloads Direct downloads Send report
  • Torrent:
  • Category:
    Other / Articles
  • Private Client:
    Hide your personal activity while downloading torrents with TorrentPrivacy.com
  • Size:
    0.2 MB
  • Seeds/Leechs:
    1/0 Check it now
  • Added:
    08/03/2008
  • Last check:
    2009-06-26 18:58:57
  • Tracker:
    http://open.tracker.thepiratebay.org
  • Comments:
    EVIDENCE OF ATLANTIS? THE SPHINX<br /> <br /> SPHINX EROSION EXPOSE': COULD IT BE A SCHOCKING HOAX?<br /> <br /> Is the geological erosion theory of Professor Robert Schoch of Boston University accurate, or is this a Schocking hoax? A layman in the field of geology uses GoogleEarth, attendance at the site in Giza, and a little common sense to flesh out the 15-20 year old &quot;theory&quot; of Schoch, wherein Schoch appears to have claimed that ancient &quot;rains&quot; caused erosion to the lower body and the stone cavity (edges) of the Great Sphinx at the Giza Plateau of Egypt.<br /> <br /> Schoch has put his academic integrity on the line to demonstrate using his theory that the Sphinx is actually far older than the Great Pyramid. In fact the research claims the Sphinx is from the ancient city of Atlantis........Hold it! Isn't Atlantis a myth? Legend? Lore? How can a reputable person claim that a large rock sculpture is designed and built by a comic book legend? One must wonder.<br /> <br /> Our first concern in this review of the general concept is two-fold..............If the &quot;lower&quot; body of the Sphinx was damaged and eroded by rains of 5000-10,000 years ago then why wasn't the head and upper body effected? That doesn't make sense, does it? If there was rain one would think there was rain all over, and the head would be effected as well, right? Why is the lower body of the Sphinx so heavily weathered and worn, yet the head reveals no such damage whatsoever? This seems suspect. If lime rock submerged in water breaks down and forms carbonic acid, then wouldn't the lower body deteriorate from standing water if the water lever was higher than it is today? (Schoch's group of hoaxters claims the head was re-sculpted, but this a partial answer from the most naive. We will address this in the text.)<br /> <br /> Our second concern is that many years ago when the Arabs stripped the casing stones off of the Great Pyramid it is said that the stone fascia was water damaged. This is amazing, however the indication is that only the lower half of the Great Pyramid was water effected. There was apparently no damage to the upper half of the Great Pyramid outer lime stone covering. Why is the lower casing said to be damaged, but not the upper casing? This is odd. Sounds like a similar pattern, UNLESS there was water that flowed out of the pyramid, ran down the side, and then down the hill to the Sphinx. That could happen, or could it? We have released some free info that explores that idea: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.SolomonSeries.com/orders.php">www.SolomonSeries.com/orders.php</a> . You will see this soundly refutes Schoch's hoax and many others. The truth will indeed set you free.<br /> <br /> Isn't this odd? Two structures in nearly the same proximity of one another show water damage in the lower extremities only, and none whatsoever at the upper areas. Could this be signs of the &quot;flood&quot; of Noah as reported in the Bible? Very likely NO, because that account states that all the earth was covered with water. If the pyramid was covered with water then the entire structure would have water damge.............BUT since the Great Pyramid sits on a base 115 feet (or so) higher than the 65 foot tall Sphinx, then water raising to the mid body of the pyramid would COMPLETELY submerge the tiny little Sphinx at its feet.<br /> <br /> For a better understanding of the actual no frills &quot;flood&quot; of Noah see our review/expose coming soon The Bible Plumb Line: Flood of Noah.............As we look further at the structures at Giza and at the photos that follow, we see that the Great Pyramid is on a plain 115 feet higher than the Sphinx. Since the Sphinx is only 65 feet high, and it sits in a HOLE 115 feet lower than the pyramid, then a great flood of the pyramid would have completely submerged the Sphinx, and there is no evidence of this. Since the head erosion/damage is not consistent with the body of the Sphinx, then this is not evidence of the Biblical flood. <br /> <br /> (In reference to the Biblical flood we would expect the &quot;flood&quot; event to have occurred before pyramid construction since the pyramid does not show flood damage consistent with what we would expect. In this regard, we need to revisit common theology, which we will address soon. Is our theology out of line? Maybe! We shall expose that error if it indeed exists. Go get our &quot;Death of Joseph&quot; book to get started <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.SolomonSeries.com/orders.php">www.SolomonSeries.com/orders.php</a> ) There are answers and information coming regarding the alleged &quot;Joseph&quot; Prime Minister of Egypt that will blow your mind.<br /> <br /> Lower body erosion with no top area erosion of two structures at different heights above sea level is not consistent with the flood of the Bible, OR the rain as claimed by Schoch. Meanwhile, since the Sphinx is &quot;downhill&quot; and near the Great Pyramid then any water running off the Pyramid would naturally wash down hill to the Sphinx. This means the erosion at the Sphinx is likely from the run-off from above and potentially a high water table. Isn't this simple to follow? What if water ran down hill from the Pyramid to the Sphinx and the area around the Sphinx filled with water causing the lower body erosion? Wouldn't standing water in the void area around the Sphinx cause an exponential acceleration of erosion? Of course it would, but aren't we in the desert? Yes or No?<br /> <br /> As we look at this erosion perspective one would assume that a reputable geologist would understand rocks? Lime rock? Hold it! Isn't lime rock typically the result of a mineral base left by a water body subsiding? Yes! Doesn't lime rock erode and wash away in the presence of water? Yes................So if a geologist was to address lime rock erosion based on the presence of water, wouldn't they locate the water and water table? What water?<br /> <br /> Would it surprise you to learn that the water table TODAY at Giza is only 9 feet below the Sphinx? Wouldn't a serious study of erosion concerning a rock type formed from subsiding waters at least look at the water table in the area? One would think, but Schoch's work may have been flawed for failing to address some obvious issues. Let's not study urban myth, but rather look to see what is there today. We see an abundance of water!! How Schoching!<br /> <br /> Before we look at photos, are you familiar with the Aswan Dam? Nasser Lake? Up river of the Great Pyramid and Sphinx there is a dam project that has been holding back the flow of water for nearly 120 years. The presence of the dam upstream very likely has lowered the ground water level downstream! Isn't this a simple concept? Isn't it easy to see that water use and consumption changes in the 1890's would have affected the height of water table in the region? Is it fair to assume if the dam upriver was removed that the water table would be higher? Is it reasonable to think the modern city of Cairo sits today in a place that was once a flood plain? The city now sits, where the river once did!<br /> <br /> Here I show you a recent aerial of the Giza Plateau. First I want to show you a typical &quot;GoogleEarth&quot; view of the plateau.<br /> <br /> Now, please look at the identification of items on the plateau. Many people are drawn to the pyramids in the picture, meanwhile I draw you to the lower right hand side of the photo.<br /> <br /> As you can see there are a number of &quot;issues&quot; that need to be addressed by a proper &quot;water erosion&quot; expose' on the Giza Plateau.<br />
  • Alternative download:
    Professor Robert Schoch of Boston University-Geology states the Sphinx is of Atlantean origins.True? might also be available on Usenet. Get the UseNet Client - Highspeed Access To 300TB of Videos, Games and Music!
Download Torrent Secure download Usenet 5x faster downloads Direct downloads Send report

Files

File Size
  10The Schoching Drawing of the Giza Plateau Aerial.pdf 0.2 MB



Add comment