Long ago, exactly 10 years ago, muggles of the world first saw the screen incarnation of "boy who survived." It was a risky venture, since by that time only three Harry Potter books were published, and, despite their popularity, it was unknown what will be the end of the whole story. And now it has over once and forever. David Yates, who was widely considered almost the worst of directors of "Harry Potter", suddenly shot a powerful film, exactly that film, which has met all the expectations of the muggle all over the world.
As you know, Warner Bros. planned to release the first part in 3D, but inconsistency in the actions of business units led to the fact that to ensure adequate quality stereoscopic projection for the remaining time before the premiere, it was not possible. Naturally, it was already on the conversion of footage, because the shooting took place in the traditional way.
Released in November 2010, the picture, despite some of the viscosity of the plot, fully met the expectations. From the outset it was clear it will relinquish only "Philosopher's stone" in box office, which eventually happened. In theory, this would convince the Warner Bros. that the great interest of the audience for the final "Harry Potter" does not need any makeup in the form of stereoscopic video. But it is not convinced.
David Yates has done the impossible. It seems that he considered all claim to his first experiments with "potteriana" and created dark, dynamic and full of real drama, focusing in particular characters movie.
All actors play wonderful! Especially Alan Rickman! The scenes with his participation have always been a decoration of the series, but in the case of "Deathly gifts", he literally "stole" the whole movie. The episode, in which Severus with absolutely lifeless face, which nevertheless reflected an incredible storm of feelings, enters into the wrecked apartment of Potter, sneaks up to the coccyx. And believe me, this author does not belong to particularly sensitive moviegoers.
Certainly good and himself Daniel Radcliffe, who was able to manifest his potential inherent like dramatic actor. There were feelings that at some early draft script writers have underestimated the possibility of an actor and put his talent in too narrow limits. Diligently to cope with their images and Rupert Grint with Emma Watson, though not implemented in the final of all the possibilities, but give the audience, without a doubt the most passionate kiss of the whole saga.
And the conclusion follows. For all conceivable claims, the final "Harry Potter" has turned out. Moreover, in my opinion, this is the best part of the saga, which easily will earn a billion to the whole Harry Potter episodes.
Unfortunately, the movie was over. But, honestly, did any of us Muggles would mind if a few years later, JK Rowling will suddenly announce that the story of the "boy who survived" not yet completed?